Last Updated: February 2026
At vishvx.com, our mission is to “Explain the World Simply.” However, simplicity never comes at the cost of accuracy. In the fields of Health, Science, and Education, misinformation can have real-world consequences. This Fact-Check Policy outlines the rigorous steps we take to ensure every piece of information we publish is reliable, current, and verified.
1. Our Verification Process
Before any article is published, it undergoes a three-step verification process:
- Source Evaluation: We only use “Gold Standard” sources, such as peer-reviewed scientific journals, official government portals (like the Ministry of Education or Health), and internationally recognized institutions.
- Data Cross-Referencing: A single source is never enough. We cross-reference statistics and technical claims across multiple reputable platforms to ensure consensus.
- Contextual Accuracy: We ensure that “Trending Topics” are not just reported as headlines but are placed in their proper scientific or historical context to avoid sensationalism.
2. What We Consider “Reliable Sources”
For our core niches, we rely on:
- Health: PubMed, WHO, ICMR, and Mayo Clinic.
- Education: Official University boards, National Testing Agency (NTA) updates, and verified career data.
- Science: NASA, ISRO, Nature Journal, and MIT Technology Review.
- Trends: Reputable news agencies (Reuters, AP) and primary data from financial institutions.
3. Correcting Mistakes
We are committed to the truth. If a reader or an expert points out a factual error, or if new scientific data emerges that contradicts a previous post:
- We investigate the claim within 24 hours.
- If an error is found, we update the article immediately.
- We add a “Fact-Check Update” note at the top or bottom of the post, explaining what was changed and why.
4. Expert Insights
Whenever possible, we consult with professionals in the Education, Science, or Medical fields to review our “simplified” explanations. This ensures that in our effort to make things “simple,” we haven’t lost the technical nuance of the subject.